Apple Appealing Against UK ‘Back Door’ Order, Tribunal Confirms

Date:

Apple is appealing against a British government order to create a “back door” to its encrypted cloud storage systems, the Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT) confirmed on Monday.

The IPT said in a written ruling that it had refused the British government’s application that “the bare details of the case”, including that it was brought by Apple, be kept private.

Apple and Britain’s Home Office, its interior ministry, did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The Washington Post reported in February that Britain had issued a “technical capability notice” to Apple to enable access to encrypted messages and photos, even for users outside the country.

Apple has long said that it would never build a so-called backdoor into its encrypted services or devices, because once one is created, it could be exploited by hackers in addition to governments, a sentiment echoed by security experts.

The iPhone maker in response to Britain’s sweeping demands removed its most advanced security encryption for cloud data, called Advanced Data Protection, for new users in Britain.

The Financial Times later reported Apple had brought an appeal against the order, but details of the case have been shrouded in secrecy and neither Apple nor the British government have publicly confirmed the technical capability notice.

The IPT’s ruling said that neither Apple nor Britain had confirmed or denied the accuracy of media reports, adding: “This judgment should not be taken as an indication that the media reporting is or is not accurate.”

The Home Office had argued that publicising the existence of the appeal or that it was brought by Apple could damage national security.

But Judges Rabinder Singh and Jeremy Johnson said: “We do not accept that the revelation of the bare details of the case would be damaging to the public interest or prejudicial to national security.”

See also  HMD Barbie Phone With 2.8-Inch Main Display, Themed Accessories Launched in India: Price, Specifications

Monday’s ruling follows a hearing in London last month, which was held in secret with media not allowed to attend.

© Thomson Reuters 2025

Apple is appealing against a British government order to create a “back door” to its encrypted cloud storage systems, the Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT) confirmed on Monday.

The IPT said in a written ruling that it had refused the British government’s application that “the bare details of the case”, including that it was brought by Apple, be kept private.

Apple and Britain’s Home Office, its interior ministry, did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The Washington Post reported in February that Britain had issued a “technical capability notice” to Apple to enable access to encrypted messages and photos, even for users outside the country.

Apple has long said that it would never build a so-called backdoor into its encrypted services or devices, because once one is created, it could be exploited by hackers in addition to governments, a sentiment echoed by security experts.

The iPhone maker in response to Britain’s sweeping demands removed its most advanced security encryption for cloud data, called Advanced Data Protection, for new users in Britain.

The Financial Times later reported Apple had brought an appeal against the order, but details of the case have been shrouded in secrecy and neither Apple nor the British government have publicly confirmed the technical capability notice.

The IPT’s ruling said that neither Apple nor Britain had confirmed or denied the accuracy of media reports, adding: “This judgment should not be taken as an indication that the media reporting is or is not accurate.”

The Home Office had argued that publicising the existence of the appeal or that it was brought by Apple could damage national security.

See also  Samsung Expands One UI 7 Rollout to Include Galaxy S21, Galaxy S22 Models and Other Phones

But Judges Rabinder Singh and Jeremy Johnson said: “We do not accept that the revelation of the bare details of the case would be damaging to the public interest or prejudicial to national security.”

Monday’s ruling follows a hearing in London last month, which was held in secret with media not allowed to attend.

© Thomson Reuters 2025

 

Share post:

Subscribe

spot_imgspot_img

Popular

More like this
Related

South Carolina prepares for second firing squad execution

A firing squad is set to kill a South...

RRB ALP Recruitment 2025: Apply for 9,970 vacancies from April 12; check selection process and other details here

The RRB ALP Recruitment 2025 application process for 9,970...

‘Gauti (Gautam Gambhir) bhai has helped me understand my potential’

Washington Sundar, a versatile all-rounder, faces the challenge of...

Apple is left without a life raft as Trump’s China trade war intensifies, analysts warn

Apple remains stranded without a life raft, experts say,...